|
Integration in closed formLet us recall the so-called fundamental theorem of calculus.
Such a function is called a primitive of (or anti-derivative of , indefinite integral of ). is determined up to an additive constant. The usual notation for is . Now we can compute immediately lots of integrals: EXAMPLE 3.1.
In order to compute this integral we must find a function such that
One sees immediately that
is such a function. And so
EXAMPLE 3.2.
We must find a function such that
Here we are ``fortunate'' again, because one sees at once that
will do. So we find
Apply evalf if you want a numerical result,
EXAMPLE 3.3.
Now we should find such that
This is a bit harder. However, we can proceed as follows. We can find a which is almost OK:
Then
In this expression we should get rid of the term . So if we can find a function satisfying , we are done, because then we can replace by . So we are reduced to a similar, but simpler problem. A candidate for is given by . Then . Now we must get rid of the term . This is easy: replace by :
This is what we were looking for. Hence our becomes
Check:
The trick applied twice in the latter example is the so-called
integration by parts which can be expressed by the following
formula
This is valid for continuously differentiable functions and . The proof is by differentiation. Exercise 3.1. Compute the primitives of the following functions. Check the results by differentiating: Exercise 3.2. (cf. EXAMPLE 1.4.) Compute . Hint: use the relation . EXAMPLE 3.4.
(restricted to ). Here integration by parts seems
powerless. In textbooks you may find:
The first relation makes sense when one applies the thumb rule: ; the second one by putting ln, namely and substituting by . This juggling can be turned into a precise theorem:
The proof of this useful theorem is very simple: differentiate both
sides of the formula with respect to . Then one gets an equality. So
both members differ by a constant (i.e. independent of ). Finally,
substitute . Often the substitution rule is written in a less
careful way:
Example 3.4. now goes as follows: let and Then and Hence we find EXAMPLE 3.5.
Here the substitution is helpful. To be a bit more precise the function
is defined and it is greater than for and is restricted to . Then
because for the values of under consideration. Since the substitution formula yields . Obviously, we want as a function of . This is easy: is the inverse function arcsin of sin. Hence Exercise 3.3.
Compute
and check your result by differentiating.
Remark: This method works for any integral of the form , where is rational function of two variables. Exercise 3.4. Compute .
|
|