HEJ, HU ISSN 1418-7108 Manuscript no.: ANM-981030-A
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/168ed/168ed73c1b73e10ac73f6f4a4940cf9a1381e29e" alt="next" |
|
Let us first recall the principal equations.
We get from the Maxwell equations in the magnetostatic case
the relations
with
in the nonlinear model, cf. [8].
Here, the magnetic field strength is denoted by
,
the magnetic induction by
, and
is the current density.
Since (3)
holds, we can introduce the magnetic vector potential
by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af664/af664f051e75b1e77e42545289446aa543ef21a7" alt="\begin{displaymath}
{ \bf rot }{\vec{\rm {A}}} = {\vec{\rm {B}}}.
\end{displaymath}" |
(4) |
In magnetostatics, the Coulomb gauge
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/959f7/959f7d3e48b3afea7ae444ae0da09e7fa0153380" alt="\begin{displaymath}
\div {\vec{\rm {A}}} = 0
\end{displaymath}" |
(5) |
is standard.
Thus, we end up with the equations
for the unknown vector potential
.
If permanent magnets are involved,
must be replaced by
.
According to material properties, the coefficient
depends on the position .
With the unknown
, equations (6) and (7)
can be rewritten as
We can formulate a linear problem by the equations
(10) and (9),
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b863/3b86317f2740edb60f9944afae9e37def2657f0b" alt="\begin{displaymath}
{ \bf rot }\left( \nu \left( x \right) { \bf rot }{\bf u} \right)
= {\bf f},
\end{displaymath}" |
(10) |
which is a good approximation for the nonlinear problem
if we can neglect saturation effects in ferromagnetic materials.
| HEJ, HU ISSN 1418-7108 Manuscript no.: ANM-981030-A
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/168ed/168ed73c1b73e10ac73f6f4a4940cf9a1381e29e" alt="next" |
|